Skip to content
Copy ID

Previously ATLAS-R-004

DatasetPreprintOpen Access

GCT-100K: A Cyber-Manipulation Benchmark with a Cognitive Manipulation Score

  • Dhadi Sai Praneeth Reddy1
  1. 1 Atlas AI Labs

01

Brief

Problem
Digital fraud works by manipulating people (fear, urgency, trust), yet most security datasets label messages only as malicious or benign.
Approach
GCT-100K collects 100,000 samples across phishing, OTP fraud and social engineering, and introduces the Cognitive Manipulation Score (CMS) to quantify manipulation.
Contribution
An Apache 2.0 benchmark for measuring how manipulative a message is, not just whether it is malicious.

02

Status

Preprint
  1. Idea
  2. Experiments
  3. Drafting
  4. Review
  5. Released (current stage)

03

Abstract

Digital fraud works by manipulating people (fear, urgency, trust), yet most security datasets label messages only as malicious or benign. GCT-100K collects 100,000 samples across phishing, OTP fraud and social engineering, and introduces the Cognitive Manipulation Score (CMS) to quantify manipulation. An Apache 2.0 benchmark for measuring how manipulative a message is, not just whether it is malicious.

04

Identifiers

05

Key results

  • 100K

    Samples

    Phishing, OTP fraud, social engineering.

  • 3

    Manipulation families

    Phishing · OTP fraud · Social engineering.

  • CMS

    Cognitive Manipulation Score

    Novel metric introduced with the dataset.

  • Apache 2.0

    Licence

    Open for research and commercial use.

06

Write-up

What's inside

GCT-100K covers three families of cyber manipulation:

  • Phishing
  • OTP fraud
  • Social engineering

Each sample is scored with the Cognitive Manipulation Score (CMS), a metric for how strongly a message manipulates its reader.

07

Cite this work

Reddy, D. S. P. (n.d.). GCT-100K: A Cyber-Manipulation Benchmark with a Cognitive Manipulation Score [Data set]. Atlas AI Labs. https://dspraneeth07.in/research/gct-100k
.bib .ris

08

Code & data

  • Open licence (Apache 2.0)

Want to discuss or collaborate on this work?

Questions, replications, reviews and collaborations are all welcome.